Better than II or worse then II? There is some debate on that.
At least we can clearly see the monsters in this one.
The gore is worse than ever with decapitations, and the monster eating the head whole, and then, I kid you not, eliminating the uneaten head.
If you have epilepsy, you might not want to watch the last 10 minutes or so. It flashes on and off and it made me dizzy.
It was better that Feast II, but not by much. It was a gore-fest with lots of action, but it was hard to follow exactly what was going on most of the time.
The ending was a real shock!

4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Yes, just a few short months after Feast II, here comes the happy finish to the trilogy. And while this one is not as good as the first one, it is a bit better than two. The focus of this one is comedy more than horror, though there is plenty of gore and once again boobs to keep me entertained, but then I am a pervert who likes a good gory movie. The story has our group of survivors right where they were after the last movie and like the last movie they have to do a lot of stuff to try and survive. They have no need to fear though as a butt kicking gun touting hero, a prophet, and a martial arts master come to the aid of our tired and beat down gang. They have to go through many obstacles on their way to finding a way past the deadly creatures that feast upon human flesh. From the rooftop where we left them, to the sheriff's office, and to a drainage pipe. You will get to see one person tired of the abuse get out of the film fairly quickly, lots of deaths, the use of gunpowder to stop the bleeding, and an ending that made me go 'what'? It is far from perfect as the tunnel scenes were a bit dark and they used night vision camera's a bit to much. Still the cast is still funny in a strange way and I like the way it follows the first movies format of introducing the characters and the previous movies combined. It is nice in this entire series that the monsters are a combination of costume and makeup rather than the computer generated monsters of the science fiction channel too. I don't understand why the score is so low here on the same level with the abysmal 'Automaton Transfusion' as that piece of crap had no sort of ending whatsoever and the effects were not good even for a low budget movie. Though people here probably took pity upon it because it was a beginner film maker who made it.

18 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Feast III: The Happy Finish continues directly from where the last one ended. It's like they were filmed simultaneously. Had to be. Honey Pie's final fate is decided in the very beginning and we're treated to a very nice crapping scene that's quite literally right in your face. Best line of the movie? There's 2. One is during an argument where a female gang member said, '(starts with a 'b,' rhymes with itch), I will (rhymes with suck, starts with an 'f') you up!' It ain't what she said, it's how she said it. Awesome stuff! The other is when a new character is introduced. He said, 'I got the gift, (starts with the letter 'f,' rhymes with maggots)!' You'll see what he's referring to when you see this. This movie would be just like the 2nd part with more absurdities and new characters that add to that mix.
It's a continuation through and through but some scenes tend to drag out, like when they were in the sewer. Some made little sense, like the mutated humans. It got to the point where it was almost without direction because stuff was happening that didn't lend much to story progression and it's the same creative team who did the first 2. You expect a certain level of quality. The beginning and middle of the movie are what they should be. The end is where everything starts going south. From the survivors fighting their way out of the mutant herd, to biting away at one of the monsters as if they were monsters themselves, to the worst ending of any movie I have ever seen. Yes, I said it, THE WORST ENDING TO ANY MOVIE I HAVE EVER SEEN! The ending just makes everything else that happens prior seem meaningless. You forget about all the humor and other good stuff because it's just that bad.
It's almost like they ran out of ideas and just put something together for the sake of completeness. A better ending would have been the monster at the end being benevolent and it did seem that way. And then they could have went out into the city safe zone where they were trying to get to and proceeded with the plot. Not the pure garbage that was given to us. I don't know what anyone involved with the ending of this movie was thinking. No one spoke up or said anything? No one told the writers that this was stupid? Did them or Gulager really have something to do with this? It just makes not one shred of sense in comparison to EVERYTHING that came before it. I don't get it. Oh yeah, there's nudity in this flick too. One of the biker chicks bites the big one and you're treated to some really good, close-up boob shots if you like that sort of thing.
From Feast I all the way to the middle of Feast III, you'll be completely and totally entertained. But the last act in Feast III, I don't know, man. I don't know what happened there. I'm purposely not saying what happened because if you haven't seen these flicks yet, you need to. Despite the horrible (not happy) finish, I'd recommend getting all of these as a set on DVD/Blu-ray. They're all worth paying for and all worth watching back to back to back. Enjoy the first part, don't eat when watching the second one, and be prepared for the crappy finish to the 3rd. They're even considering a fourth part. After the fiasco with part 3's climax, please don't do it unless you plan on exploring the origins of the creatures. Feast III gets 4 out of 10 stars. Would have gotten 6 but the ending really is that bad.

3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Ask the best chefs in the world and they will say that 'presentation is everything'; it's an old adage that I really wish director John Gulager had applied when serving up The Happy Finish, the final chapter in his Feast trilogy. Style and attention to detail are in short order, the film being dished up with all the finesse of a pig farmer with a slop bucket; if it was the third course in a meal, it would result in a severe case of indigestion.
Like Beluga caviar, Marmite and Spam, the film's main ingredients—extreme gore, female nudity, offensive humour, rubbery monsters, and random perversion—are an acquired taste, but Gulager's scatter-shot approach results in a chaotic mess that even seasoned fans of trashy horror will be hard pushed to stomach. There are one or two tasty morsels on offer—some decent effects and a couple of genuinely funny gags—but these are completely smothered by the irritating editing, half-baked ideas, unlikable characters, moronic moments, and truly bizarre directorial choices (an entire scene lit by a strobe?!?!) all of which serve to kill the appetite quicker than a short, curly hair in your mashed potato.

5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Loved the first two, very unpredictable and amusing.
This one feels formulaic and dull. You can't really tell what is going on (as mentioned elsewhere) most of the scenes are in darkness with flashing lights and shaky camera work.
I had to constantly prize my finger away from the fast forward button as the characters twittered on or trudged down another pitch black sewer.
It feels like this film is the unwanted runt of the litter, undernourished and unloved.
The ending was so bad I wonder if the director has grown bored of the Feast franchise and hammered nails into its coffin so he wouldn't be bugged about making a fourth.

4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

After the demented roller-coaster ride in part two, this boring and literally unwatchable appendix is quite a let-down compared to the earlier installments.
Despite the far-fetched ending, which is so absurd as to be actually funny, we've got more of the same, but with diminishing returns (and badly lit at that.) The newly introduced characters aren't that much of a big deal, either, and the blissfully short running time reflects the uninspired nature of the whole schlock parade.
It was time to end this carnage.
3 out of 10 (h)armless karate kids

2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Even though I have seen all the FEAST films this one is the first of the series I have commented on, I liked both FEAST 1 and 2 but this one, was too overdone and by that I mean the outrageous gross out humor, in the first one it was gross true but it was always unexpected, in two where they took it up a notch it was also still unexpected even if it was more gross, now with three there was no humor it was just gross and when the film gets around to the part where our favorite group of survivors starts to crawl around in the sewers, its so dark the only thing you can make out during the action scenes is screams and roars because you can't see anything.
If you look at the acting you'd probably say these people need to find another profession but if you look at the material you'd think if any of these people can keep a straight face in a film like this they deserve an Oscar.
Overall, this film had the potential to be hugely entertaining, but the execution was simply put to stupid to make it so, and thus it is the weakest entry in the series

2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

When it comes to a true relic it's hard to give a review. All I can say is that this (literally) piece of s**t is good cinema.
Where this lacks in structure it makes up in substance. The substance being not the cruelty or injustice of the world, but the driving force of all humanity: fun and love.
Kaufman said that the cinema is a dead art form. Pure hubris. Of course that was after the fact that he'd just created one of the more meaningful pieces of art: Synecdoche New york. Cinema just needs to go boldly where no one has gone before.
Beyond theater, no matter how much as it hurts. Saying farewell to Shakespeare causes physical pain, but sometimes the pain is good. Or like on tn the case of a modern human being, necessary.
In cinema there's nothing to bind us. Nothing to keep us apart. The cycle begins again when nothing is given. Well, except our endless appetite for sex and violence.

2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The third and last Feast part didn't seem as bad as the second, possibly because it was more about running away from the monsters and less about trying to make the characters look funny. It is difficult to enjoy a movie when you can't make yourself to care about any of the characters. And when the gore and weirdness goes completely over the top, you just stop caring.
Bottom line: Feast was a movie I recommend to all my friends, but the second and the third installments are just bad. It is 'I wish I would have cleaned the house instead of watching it' bad. It's really depressing to see a movie bring some originality in a tired genre only to try too hard by making sequels that lack the soul of the first and exaggerate everything that didn't matter in the first place.

3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

This movie is the worst of the series, and that's saying a lot . First of all the editing in this movie is confusing and erratic . During the action scenes, its nearly impossible to see what the hell is going on . The combination of the excessively shaky camera, poor lighting, as well as the camera zooming in far too closely, make this movie extremely hard to follow . I had to pause the movie several times just to rest my eyes, and avoid possible seizures . The acting is not that good, but it could just be the mediocre script or perhaps both .
I love gory movies, but whats the point if you cant see anything ?
Don't waste your time on this, you have been warned .

9 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

If you are looking for art, this isn't the place. Then again, Feast 3 is a really decent splatter movie. We got wonderfully stereotypical characters, good presentation and decent camera work. An awful story and great effects. I laughed and I enjoyed the effects immensely.
Now, the movie is of course enjoy even more if you have already seen the other movies. But basically, it's about these people being hunted by a bunch of gruesome monsters. The amusing part of them being the fact that they have rather large... erm... reproducing organs.
People nice in hilarious ways, there is plenty of exposed boobs and the movie is certainly not for the squeamish. But as much violence, gore and blood there is, just as much humour it's got. I mean, come on, it's got a martial artist named 'Jean-Claude Segal'! Just how serious do you really think it is? In the end, the production value is dead serious, though. Just about all effects are well done and it's clear that the crew was enjoying themselves.
Great effort for a STV movie with a relatively small budget.

8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

I haven't read up on the making of, but this one feels like it was shot back-to-back with part 2. Actually it feels more like a successor (in tone and story-wise) to its predecessor than part 1 does with any of those two sequels. If you take into account that the first one was the best one, that isn't really a good thing though. But we have our written introductions back, which is a nice thing. Still worked best in the first Feast movie though.
The subtitle of the movie is happy finish, but I kinda have a feeling they wanted to use 'endings' instead of finish. I might be wrong, but that would have been more of a fit (especially thinking of 'sloppy seconds' and its meaning). Some nice ideas and one theme towards the end, that reminded me of something out of a Monthy Python movie (and the Holy Grail that is). And because you can't satisfy everybody with an ending, we get the 'wtf' treatment here. Same director as the other Feast movies

2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Let me start out by saying i am not a horror film fan. I've watched the classics but some how given up on a lot of modern day scary films,as they rely too little on plot and more on nudity,gore, violence and the latter.
Now by saying that, I've watched all three Feast films. I was skeptical,as the reviews had me expecting very little from the films. Let me say,they're not as bad as people give them credit for. A lot of it is gross,and some of the situations are tacky,but i believe the creators of this film are giving the audience the intelligence to know that it's meant to be gross,tacky and out of good taste. With that being said, the movie was quite entertaining. I liked the new characters added to this one,as it follows directly after the second film.
The movie's distasteful points I'm ashamed to admit i found a lot of humor in. I learned that comedy does not need to be intelligent or witty or even crafty to find it funny. If you're expecting Schindler's List or even The Ring, you're definitely not going to get it here. But if you're expecting entertainment packed in a horror-comedy film about disgusting monsters eating humans and killing everything in sight,you will not be too disappointed.
Movies are supposed to entertain,and i think sometimes we get caught up in what's considered a 'Good' movie, that we forget that if bad ones didn't exist,we would have little to distinguish the two.
But overall,i'd give it a 7,i would've given it more had they given the new characters more screen time ;p

1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Would someone please give Gulager a script worthy of his talent? It is clear in all three 'Feast' films that Gulager has genuine talent as a director, but the Feast scripts are increasingly puerile. The writing is neither funny nor clever, though it is clear that it thinks it is. Give Gulager a script like The Man Who Wasn't There or In Bruges and let him shine.
No more Dunstan and Melton scripts...please! Even at the most basic levels, these screenplays are flawed. For example, in Feast II (subtitled 'Sloppy Seconds' for no other reason than it makes nine-year-olds titter), characters behave inconsistently--one moment they risk their lives to save another and the next they are chickens who toss kids to monsters to save themselves--actions are implausible, and dialog is juvenile. Pouring gore onto the actors doesn't make up for a flawed story. And...there is no story here to speak of other than a bunch of cartoon characters running around getting eviscerated by monsters. If it weren't for Gulager's contribution, these films would be among the worst ever made.

5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The feast films are a breath of fresh air to the genre & after seeing the 1st 2 installments i was excited to see the third, i wasn't disappointed either.
The film picks up right after the 2nd film with the survivors still trying to escape the town & monsters but introduces some new characters as well as giving more screen time to some of the biker girls.
The comedy comes as thick & fast as the gore & special effects, on the subject of the gore the monsters are still amazing & you see quite a lot of them here & there are some memorable deaths, 1 in particular where 1 unlucky survivor performs oral sex (unwillingly) on a monster which has even worse results lol.
Overall the film is really entertaining & because it has a fast pace, the monsters are cool & the characters are interesting it seemed to be over too quickly in my opinion i wanted more! Especially with how the movie ends (which i won't go into) but i totally didn't see this 'twist' coming & after seeing this it suggests that the makers have a 4th installment up their sleeves.

2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

As breathlessly anticipated, FEAST III brings the most monstrous menage a trois in the history of skinema to a fitting climax... It's a balls-out, balls-to-the-walls wallbanger. Literally. Characters come and go with wild abandon. Monsters come and go. 'Short Bus Gus' is easily the funniest 'hero' to hit the screen since 'Short Bus' Stiller (and Robert Downey) in TROPIC THUNDER. It was sad to see 'Tats' go, but, if the prior two FEASTs are any indication, her death may only be temporary. (And the indication that there may be a fourth entry in the series is encouraging.) FEAST III is a fistload of fun, no doubt about it. (And I, for one, wouldn't mind seeing the origin of the monsters done like a black and white 1950s SF shocker. It could be titled FOUR PLAY...) If you liked BUBBA HO-TEP, you'll love the three-course meal that is the FEAST trilogy.

2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Feast was OK, good enough for a second viewing. However Feast 2 sucked, and this one, part 3, is even worse. Picks up straight from part 2 with the same bunch of characters, who I'd happily see get killed off within the first 5 minutes. Mess of a film. Nothing to recommend. The only good thing is it's 77 minutes running time, though that was 77 minutes too long!

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Watching 'Feast III' was a bad idea, not just because I knew from beforehand that I was going to hate it, but also because it's been nearly 10 years since I saw parts one and two. As it's a back-to-back sequel, 'The Happy Finish' immediately picks up where 'Sloppy Seconds' left off, and frankly I didn't have any recollection of who the lead characters were. Obviously, the script isn't rocket science, but I nevertheless missed out on the copious references towards the previous installments. The only things I remember were that I loved the first 'Feast' (refreshing and exciting) but that I absolutely disliked 'Feast II' (pretentious and boring). And, since I read in most reviews that number 3 is basically just as annoying and redundant as part 2, I probably never should have bothered.
Even though John Gulager's first film was a clever and original horror gem, the sequels seem exclusively aimed at trash-fanatics with an extremely bad taste in cinema and a weakness for vulgar and infantile toilet humor. If you fancy watching rancid stuff like anally getting raped by monsters or swallowed human heads coming right back out of the rear end, you can't afford to let 'Feast III' bypass. However, if you have a tiny bit of dignity left, you'll be eye-rolling the entire time and resisting to push the 'stop' or 'fast-forward' button. Maybe I've become a sourpuss over the years, but I fail to see what's funny about a bloke stumbling and driveling through the entire film with a metal pipe through his head. And, if the tastelessness doesn't turn you off, the downright lousy digital effects and amateurish editing will!

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Simple few sentence review. The series OTHER than the original is utter garbage and a complete mess. The final in the series Happy Finish is just plain dumb.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

What a disappointment. They ruined everything and it started so well
The third movie isn't good, its full dark all the time, i spent 1 hour of not seeing anything only dark and screams, and some screenshots. And an unfair unreasonable ending. It has so much potential it could go so perfect and they messed it up. Im done with Feasts R.I.P.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Feast III: The Happy Finish is one of my top favorite movies, including the previous two chapters from one of my top favorite directors, John Gulager. Written by Marcus Dunstan and Patrick Melton and featuring The Great Legendary Clu Gulager, Diane Ayala Goldner, Tom Gulager and many more. A film series that has everything an extreme fan will faithfully love. It even makes huge Hollywood monster/survival films into a PG show for kids. That's how freakin' extreme it is and everything is hardcore to the max with awesome, crazy characters battling against hungry and horny creatures with lots of blood, gore, action, comedy, and so much more, in an extremely disturbing and funny way. My favorite character is Biker Queen played by Diane Goldner, who is one of the toughest, meanest, and baddest women characters I've seen. She ain't no Alice from the Resident Evil films and for damn sure she ain't any PG13 action character from The Expendables films or any other overrated action films, she is just that great when it comes to being bad and tough!!! I have said this before and I will say it again, this is an extreme film series that I'll never and I mean never ever, get bored of!!!

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

I really liked Feast 1 - Great cast, story and very well done. I found Feast II the other day and found it lacking, but still not bad. Feast III was just... Ridiculous. That is the only word to describe it. It's like the writer got high and blown out of his mind and started writing random trash. I could write a better story than what they came up with for the third one. It amazes me how these people get the money to make trash like this movie.
I gave it a 2 only because it was good on continuing with people from the previous movies. That is the ONLY good thing about this movie.
Maybe they should just start from scratch and reboot this like most everything else in Hollywood since Hollywood has run out of original ideas.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Forced to find new battle strategies, the dwindling number of survivors are caught in a race through underground sewers in an effort to finally escape from the marauding creatures once and for all.
On the whole this one turned out to be a minor disappointment compared to the others in the series. The biggest problem with this one tends to be the rather shortened length of time here, barely running a full hour despite a non-stop pace that features a ton of action throughout here. This tends to make this feel more like it should've been built together into the second entry and tacked onto that one rather than being shuffled off into a new effort as several scenes from that could've been taken out and replaced with the action of this one to make for a seamless transition. That tends to make this one feel a tad worthless and expendable with not really needing to be featured at all which is quite disappointing overall. Still, this one really gets a lot to like throughout as this one tends to continue on in the series' penchant for over-the-top extremity throughout with not only the scatological references and intensely sexualized nature of both the creatures and the survivors but also in regards to the gore which is again quite gruesome and endearing. In addition to limbs being ripped off and entrails splattered across the ground but also there's vicious stab-wounds, tons of scratches and clawed up bodies, decapitations and bodies bursting from the inside out among other vicious tactics which is quite fun here. This rampant amount of gore comes from the nearly-relentless pace featured here with the attacks continuing on throughout the film with the race through the car-yard, a battle in an underground hole and the numerous battles in the sewers providing both action and suspense as the vicious creatures create several encounters here that are quite enjoyable including the blazing final battle in a strobe-light-lit rave scene that's quite thrilling and exciting. The creatures still look good, there's a lot to like here, but those few small problems do hold this down.
Rated Unrated/R: Extreme Graphic Violence, Extreme Graphic Language, Nudity, plenty of scatological references and gross creature humor.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

A handful of desperate survivors do their best to get out of a small town that has been overrun by vicious predatory humanoid beasts. Director John Gulager goes way overboard with the alarmingly excessive over-the-top graphic gore (limbs are torn off, entrails ripped out, and so on), pulls zero punches with his take-no-prisoners crass and offensive attitude, draws the loopy characters in amusingly colorful broad strokes, milks the uproariously crude sense of shameless lowbrow humor for maximum sick belly laughs (one poor guy gets anally raped and impregnated by a monster!), and concludes the whole delightfully demented affair with a genuinely surprising and unexpected 'what the hell?' ending that comes completely out of left field. The game cast has a ball with the go-for-broke crazy material, with especially stand-out work from Clu Gulager as the tough, leathery, and seemingly indestructible bartender, Hanna Putnam as religious kook Secrets, Diane Ayala Goldner as a two-fisted motorcycle mama, Juan Longoria Garcia as rough'n'tumble midget wrestler Lightning, Carl Anthony Payne III as sleazy and selfish jerk used car lot owner Slasher, and William Prael as a depraved hobo. Super hotties Chelsea Richards and Melissa Reed provide some tasty gratuitous bare female skin as a couple of sassy'n'sexy biker babes. As with the previous entries in this series, it's director Gulager's bold-faced willingness to spit in the face of restraint, subtlety, decorum, and political correctness that in turn makes this film such a perversely enjoyable riot to watch. Good down'n'dirty creature feature fun.

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

I was for sure the third film couldn't possibly be as painful as the second one, and boy was I wrong. Just the underground strobe light sequence where you can't decipher what the hell was going on as infected humans, a monster, and our lone survivors are duking it out, I went for the Tylenol. This film deals with those left alive at the end of the second film, dealing with the monsters as they discover three new characters along the way. One is a prepared and confident leader type whose fate is sealed when he attempts to show Secrets how to shoot a pistol. One is a very talented martial artist whose arms are both eaten off leaving him little help to anyone. The third is a prophet who seems to have the gift to ward off the monsters, only to discover that it's the screeching sound of his ear piece causing them to move away. The prophet talks the remaining members from the second film into going underground in the sewer tunnels and this idea, while seeming like an ideal strategy, doesn't help them as infected human freaks, demented and violent, are wandering around. And, behind them comes a monster. Those that remain include Biker Queen(Diane Goldner), Secrets(Hanna Putnam), Greg(Tom Gulager), Lightning(Juan Longoria García), Bartender(Clu Gulager), and Tat Girl(Chelsea Richards). Following the Prophet, they encounter far more danger than possibly realized. At the start of the film, they are able to finally get inside the sheriff's office, getting their revenge on Hobo(William Prael)who kept the building locked tight, by beating him to a pulp. When they realize that this will only service them temporarily, the gang splits up after exiting. Discovering Hobo's meth lab(..in a school bus buried under the earth), Biker Queen and Tat Girl finally believe they will be able to finally flee the premises, encountering engine problems. That's when they meet the Prophet, watching him command the monsters to scatter, and follow him into the sewers.
I don't know what director Gulager was attempting to accomplish with the ending, regarding the giant robot, but I was at my wit's end with the movie anyway. You get plenty of bloody carnage, but seeing what's going on is a major factor I struggled with. I soon just gave up caring and followed the mind-numbingly brain-dead flick until it's conclusion, breathing a sigh of relief as the Elvis impersonator was singing some song in Mexican as the credits rolled. For those that care, Slasher(Carl Anthony Payne II)gets anal raped by a monster who impregnates him, creating a hybrid human creature spawn! When the movie moves underground, almost all of it is incomprehensible and dark. There's some use of 'nocturna vision', but even that is shot in such a haphazard manner, I doubt few will be satisfied. And, as the first two films proved, these characters have little worth, so their deaths couldn't come fast enough. John Allen Nelson is Sh#tkicker, the hero stereotype Gulager gets rid of just for the hell of it and Craig Henningsen is Jean Claude Seagal, the kickboxer who doesn't hold onto his arms very long. Josh Blue barely registers as Prophet, under a cloak, he mumbles directions and occasionally tells the monsters to take a hike as others complain of how noisy his hearing aid is, not knowing that it's loud frequency irritates the beasties. Greg goes almost the entire film with that pipe jammed into his face, and Bartender attempts to cauterize Claude Seagal's wounds like in Rambo III blowing the poor kid's other arm off!

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink